Friday, January 28, 2005

Ooops!

I also meant to tell yall that the actual "stumbling block" for American's is our socities intense obssession with sex. Its either overrated or underestimated.

MTV is a great example of how sex is overrated. Sex is sex. It feels good....?

But some people underestimate sex. Women very often use sex against men. Or use it to get what they want. Some people just don't know how powerful sex and one's sex drive can be.

But for many couples, sex is where it should be. It's considered a very private, enjoyable activity for a single married couple. And it's said that embracing an erotic sexual relationship with one's spouse can be much more fullfilling than one of casual sex.

Ok... I'm done now.

An Obssession with Sex: Americas' stumbling block

Just like the title says... American's are obsessed with sex. Well, what about people from Europe?? They have open sexual relationships.... and stuff like that is OK over there. So, what's so bad about American's??

Here's what wrong: Back in the 1950's ( the golden age of traditional values and morals) sex, drugs, divorce, and homosexuality were taboo. Sex outside of wedlock would earn any woman a glare... drugs were something to really *gasp* about... divorce was rare... and homosexuality was "in the closet". When Alfred Kinsey came along with his book, "Sexual behavior in the human male", American's were excited at the new "discoveries" that Kinsey wrote about. He was portrayed as "The Father of the sexual Revolution". And this helped to change America's ideas about sex and "self discovery". But how does this really tie into America's obssession with sex?? Easy. Once American's "discovered" themselves, morals and tradition took a tailspin. Suddenly casual sex wasn't surprising... and men and women live together outside of wedlock without a care. So?? They're just seeing whether or not they can stand each other so that IF they get married, they won't have to divorce. But guess what? They were all mistaken. Studies show (I'll have the references for yall tomorrow) that couples who lived together BEFORE marriage had a greater chance of divorce than those who lived together after marriage. A great example is... the 1950's. As I said, divorces were rare. Why? B/c for one, divorce wasn't an option!! And two... these people were expected to be married before they lived together. And as anyone can see, things were a lot better for couples and relationships back then. Right now, the rate of divorce in America is approx. 51% -ish and that isn't good at all. A little more than half of all marriages end in divorce. And let me give you an example of "If it feels good-Do it!".

I went to say hello to some gals I know that work in the same building that I do, and they just happened to be in the front entrance to the office suite. We said hello... gave and received hugs. "How are you?" . "Oh, good... can't complain...". When all of a sudden a paralegal in training comes up and starts going on about how badly her mother embarrassed her. (Keep in mind, this girl is just 20 and fresh from tech school) She crosses her black clad legs and puts on a smug/playfully annoyed expression. "So, Mom and Joe are sitting there and everyone's handing me birthday gifts and mom says, "wait, open this first". So I take the box and open it. And i pull out a little Santa's helper babydoll negligee... and there's a note at the bottom that says, "To: Amy For Chris". " And before Amy could finish her story, Kerri screeches, " OOOhhhh!! Like we don't know what you two are doing!". Then giggles giddily and widens her eyes, waiting for the conclusion to Amy's story. About this time I'm thinking..... "AHHH! If I were doing things with MY boyfriend and my parent's knew about it...Shudder... I'd never live to tell about it!" It also surprised me that Amy had no problem telling her little story in front of strangers. Not wanting to show my embarrassment by the blush that was creeping into my face, I bade a hasty goodbye to all of they gals and left. But before I managed to leave, Amy was about to launch into the story of, "How her ex walked in on she and Chris- in flagrante delecto-". I left them giggling shamelessly.

Oy. That schiksa's got a lot of chutzpah! I'd never be so bold. I guess that's a great example of different people's ideas of modesty.

Now back to Kinsey and how much of this brazen behavior has come to be. But first, let me put up some stats taken from Kinsey's research. (While funded by the Rockefeller Foundation!)

Kinsey revealed that:

95% of WWII generation American men were sex offenders (according to 1948 law)
85% Had intercourse prior to marriage
70% Had intercourse with prostitutes
30-45% of husbands had extramarital sex (affairs)
10-37% Had engaged in homosexual acts

Kinsey even claims that 1 in every 10 human beings are homosexual. And a cornerstone of gay rights movements come directly from Kinsey's published research. While much of this may seem legitimate and relevant, there comes more shocking information the deeper one looks. Example: The revolutionary Kinsey Reports were filled with Kinsey's supposed scientific research, including the suspicious "Table 34".

Table 34 on page 180 of Kinsey's "Sexual behavior in the Human Male" claims to be a scientific record of multiple orgasm in pre-adolescent males. Wherein infants as young as five months were timed with a stopwatch for "orgasm". Oh, is that hard to believe? Well, this information was taken from Kinsey's biographer, colleagues and the renowned researcher and scholar on this subject, Dr. Judith Reisman (She researches and exposes fraudulent sex science). But indeed this info is used to prove that children are sexual from birth. And now my question: How in the world do you test and infant for orgasm without making -illegal- sexual contact with it?. Well... you don't. In fact Kinsey claims that due to his "research" he's concluded that the screaming, writhing, fainting and convulsions that children do are merely "orgasms" that infants too young to speak are experiencing. Yikes! I find that a little hard to swallow don't you? But to make this a lot more believable is the fact that when asked about "Table 34" Kinsey said that the information there was taken from thousands of interviews with teachers and parents. Well... if you count sex offenders, prostitutes and pedophiles as reliable resources then, yes... I can definately believe that. Harry Hay, Rex King, Wardell Pomeroy, Clyde Marin and Paul Gebhard were friends and fellow researchers to Kinsey. Even the Famous Hugh Hefner ( created Playboy) was among Kinsey's close friends. But I guess that I'm jumping all over the place here.. Ah! so much dirt so little time!!

Here's a quick look at the REAL Kinsey, courtesy of the pro-Kinsey biographer, James H. Jones.

"In real life, Kinsey was a bisexual who preferred homosexual sex...." "He did date a woman, once, and very shortly thereafter asked her to marry him, which she did. Consummation was delayed for quite a while, because of their mutual ignorance of the mechanics involved. At some point in adolescence, Kinsey developed a taste for masochistic practices of a really cringe-inducing variety. (Two words here, and then I'm changing the subject: "urethral insertion"). He also had pronounced voyeuristic and exhibitionistic tendencies. On bug-hunting field trips in the 1930's, he liked to walk around the camp nude, and he interrogated his assistants about masturbation. Summarized from "Alfred A. Kinsey: A Public/Private Life." By James H. Jones- 1997.

More? Oh yes....

As Kinsey's key biographer tells it: "On one occasion when his inner demons plunged him to new depths of despair, Kinsey climbed into a bathtup, unfolded the blade of his pocketknife, and circumcised himself without the benefit of anesthesia." -James H. Jones

Not surprisingly, Kinsey died of, at in part, to "orchitis" at lethal infection in his testicles that followed years of sadistic, orgiastic self abuse. But when asked about how he felt about Kinsey, even knowing what he did, Jones replied, "What I told myself, and I still think this, was that I was writing a biography of a tragic hero.". Hmmm....

But then you might think, "Wasn't his research legitimate?". Nope. Dr. Reisman's findings, which were corroborated subsequently by other researchers, found that Kinsey and his researchers trashed 3/4 of their research data, based their claims about normal males on a roughly 86 percent aberrant male population including 200 sexual psychopaths, 1,400 sex offenders and hundreds of prisoners, male prostitutes and promiscuous homosexuals. Ahh... but it gets better.... Kinsey's Institute director John Bancroft insisted that all of Kinsey's childhood sexual data came from serial pedophile Rex King and other such resources. And that other such resource was Nazi war criminal Fritz Von Balluseck, who was arrested and investigated for the murder of a 10 year old girl, and was also convicted of sexual abuse of up to 200 children. And to back up my info on King, I'll use yet more of Jones's writings. Jones claims that Kinsey wrote to King: " I rejoice at everything you send, for I am then assured that much more of your material is saved for scientific publication.". Oy. Rejoice.

And to this day, the North American Man-boy Love Association (NAMBLA), the world's largest pedophile group, credits Kinsey as its scientific standard bearer. "Gay liberationists in general, and boy-lovers in particular, should know Kinsey's work and hold it dear.". - NAMBLA publication.

Still... what about those children that have been forever scarred by this? The hundreds of children tortured. Its about time someone asked questions.

But, let me give you something to ponder. Reisman notes that the comprehensive Westlaw electronic legal database has cited Kinsey positively around 650 times-"on issues from hate crimes and homosexual marriage to child custody and rape.". And the Social Science and Science Citation Indices reference Kinsey roughly 6,000 times over this same period.

If this hasn't shocked you then I don't know what would. (Note to residents of foreign countries: This info is primarily for the enlightenment of Americans and to use America's old traditions and values as an example. I mean no offense to you or your country.)




Thursday, January 27, 2005

Technical difficulties

Technically its my absent mindedness. I uhh... got offline while I was typing b/c I was expecting a call on my office phone. So I finished typing my Kinsey post and clicked "Publish Post" before I got back online. Oh well.. I'll just click "back" and then I can get online and publish it. Ha. No can do. The post I'd just written was gone.

"NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO!!!!!"

Sigh* I'll do it tomorrow. But I sure am bummed out. I guess this suits the saying, " You gotta be smarter than what you're working with.".

Until tomorrow.

Friday, January 14, 2005

The word of a Drunk

I really didn't feel like writing today, but I thought that I should clarify something for a certain person who is too crass and callow to suck it up.

Apparently, this guy (that I will call "Aussie") is absolutely disgusted with American Comedies, Soaps and Sitcoms. Snort* Not that his claims are relevent. If you don't like a TV program, you don't watch it. If you are annoyed by the popular media, then don't give it any thought. If you are too dumb to do this than you need to shut up and spare the rest of us your whining.

BTW... I only like two programs on TV. "The Nanny" with Fran Drecher and "Golden Girls". And personally, I don't care for any other shows. But I suppose to suggest reading a book would be the acme of foolishness on my part.

- For those still waiting for my Kinsey post, its on it's way. I wanted ample proof for my devoted readers. Should have it out by next week.-


Friday, December 17, 2004

Back from a lovely family get together

Yep. My big brother came home from the Navy two weeks ago... he just left wednesday. And what a nice little holiday it's been! Now I can get back to writing... but I'm going to try to stay away from any BIG issues until after the Christmas Holiday.

Unfortunately, I don't have much to talk about now. Have a Great Christmas or Hanukkah or Holiday and of course, a happy New Year.

Next issue: Alfred Kinsey- Great Scientific Mind or Psychotic child raping Masochist?

Thursday, November 11, 2004

O Tempora, O Mores!

I love logic don't you?

Sunday, November 07, 2004

For the record.....

You know... It seems to me that i need to straighten something out. Racism was the theme of one of my posts... and I'd like to let everyone know what different racial groups mean to me.

I guess I should start with African Americans. If you look at American statistics, it shows that majority of Hate crimes are instigated by blacks. It's fact. Not disputable.

Fox: But American's have MADE them like that!!!!! You STIFLE them!

Ummm.... No. Sorry, but every single American is born with certain unalienable rights. The rights to life, liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. THE PURSUIT OF HAPPINESS. If they don't choose to take advantage of that, then it's THEIR fault that they are unhappy... or "mizundastood". OH THE HORROR!!!! Did you realize that I attended a public school for several years and just last year, I was in a class with one of the "all star" basketball players. He was a very tall black guy. He was a freshman at the age of 18. Uhhh... is there a problem with that??? So anyway, all during the entire class period, the only thing that i heard was He and some other degenerate talking about how much they hated this class. I ignored it for awhile....that is until he decided to say some very cutting things to my friends. One of which is a sweet girl who cries easily. So i asked him why he felt it necessary to hurt them like that. His reply was difficult to discipher. Ebonics must be the official language of black folks these days... I couldn't understand a thing he's said. It appeared that he was on about something. And stupidly enough... he was angry that my friend had turned him down for a date. She didn't like him because he made her feel nervous. So he decided to call her every bad name possible. Its seems funny to me that the extent of their vocabulary is swear words and butchered english... not only that but majority can't conjugate to save their lives. But look, the point is, I don't hate blacks. I'm not racist either. I just don't like the fact that they hate MY race b/c they claim that we enslaved them. Ha! I wasn't alive 150 years ago. Neither was my Dad or Grandfather. But what they (and you too fox!) conveniently seem to overlook is that their own race would hunt them down and sell them to white men. THEIR OWN PEOPLE. I suppose you don't believe that. Look it up. But as i was saying.... My family voted for Alan Keyes. He's an African American gentleman who ran for President in 2000. My folks voted for him. Why? B/c he was honorable. Educated. And he upheld the American dream. HE LIVED IT. He has power, money, and respect. Except for his own race. They call him OREO. (Oreo's are yummy cookies with a chocolate crunchy outside and white filling). His own race hate him for being the way he is. We don't stifle them. They breed their hate into their children. So their children are even more hateful than the generation before. And as far as all of those other "facts" that you spoke about, they are inaccurate, and uninformed. In other words, you are dead wrong. But seeing as how it's time for me to hit the sack, I will continue to write tomorrow.

Friday, November 05, 2004

The Reckoning

The topic of this post will be mainly about the recent Presidential elections and is fraught with feelings of dislike and even hate towards Christians or any followers of the Christian God, and President Bush. I am writing this as a reply to a British fellow whom I have had the opportunity to write to via blog. (Here called "fox") This is based on a post that he made recently. (This may be difficult to follow... mainly b/c fox wrote a very long post.....)

Note: This is purely for the sake of setting him straight.

Fox,

You claimed that the gay marriage vote coincided with the presidential election and this created more incentive for evangelical Christians to vote. Then you said that ( Evangelical Christians/ Christians) always show support for a Republican leader.

I don’t believe that the gay marriage vote was even the primary reason for evangelical Christians to vote. There are many other reasons as well. Abortion being prominent in many Christian’s minds. And as far as a Christian’s choice of political party, you implied that Christians in particular tend to follow a republican. Not so. Many Christians are democrats. It just turns out that this year, the democratic candidate wasn’t to their liking. Mainly because of his views on homosexuality and abortion. As I hope you know, when people choose a leader, they tend to choose someone that shares similar moral values, principles, and beliefs. It just so happens that Bush was the only candidate that had the values that Christian’s hold dear. So to sum it up, the Christian American’s felt that Bush was the better choice, republican, democrat or otherwise.

You then accused followers of Christ to be, "... the most bigoted, blood thirsty and money-obsessed of all.". You also said that Jesus was, " the most tolerant, left wing figure in history...".

Have you ever read the bible Fox? It appears not, because all of your accusations are wrong. And to put it bluntly....stupid. Jesus, was perfect. The son of God and the redeemer of man. That is how the Christians think of Jesus. Yet, you claim that he is "left wing". In other words, you think that Jesus was a liberal. Correct? That’s what Americans call "left wing". The left wing believes in same-sex marriage and abortion. And it states quite plainly in the bible that homosexuality is wrong. Leviticus 18:22 clearly states, "Do not lie with a man as one lies with a woman; that is detestable.". That was taken from the New International Version of the "Life Application Bible". And abortion is spoken of in the Old Testament. 2 Chronicles 28:3 talks about King David’s son Ahaz who sacrificed his sons in the fire. And if you read all of 2 Chronicles 28, you can see if it isn’t so.
So if Jesus was left wing, he would have stood for abortion and homosexuality, which is exactly what his Father taught us not to indulge. Does that stand to reason? Faith and God’s love don’t adhere to a certain political view. Leave God and politics apart.


You know, I’m so glad that you called us Blood thirsty bigots, because it proves my point about racism.
Have you ever listened to Rap music? R and B? These are 2 of the most popular genres of music in America. And the race that clings to it the most are African Americans (as in they are the one’s who have laid claim to that particular type of music.) And if you read any rap lyrics, you wouldn’t think that Christians are blood thirsty bigots. So as an example, I will add a few lyrics from popular rap singers.

"Kill the white people; we gonna make them hurt; kill the white people; but buy my record first; ha, ha, ha""Kill d’White People"; Apache, Apache Ain’t Shit, 1993, Tommy Boy Music, Time Warner, USA.


"Niggas in the church say: kill whitey all night long. . . . the white man is the devil. . . . the CRIPS and Bloods are soldiers I’m recruiting with no dispute; drive-by shooting on this white genetic mutant. . . . let’s go and kill some rednecks. . . . Menace Clan ain’t afraid. . . . I got the .380; the homies think I’m crazy because I shot a white baby; I said; I said; I said: kill whitey all night long. . . . a nigga dumping on your white ass; fuck this rap shit, nigga, I’m gonna blast. . . . I beat a white boy to the motherfucking ground";"Kill Whitey"; Menace Clan, Da Hood, 1995, Rap-A-Lot Records, Noo Trybe Records, subsidiaries of what was called Thorn EMI and now is called The EMI Group, United Kingdom.

"Devils fear this brand new shit. . . . I bleed them next time I see them. . . . I pray on these devils. . . . look what it has come to; who you gonna run to when we get to mobbing. . . . filling his body up with lead, yah; cracker in my way; slitting, slit his throat; watch his body shake; watch his body shake; that’s how we do it in the motherfucking [San Francisco] Bay. . . . sitting on the dock of the dirty with my AK"; "Heat—featuring Jet and Spice 1"; Paris, Unleashed, 1998, Unleashed Records, Whirling Records.

"These devils make me sick; I love to fill them full of holes; kill them all in the daytime, broad motherfucking daylight; 12 o’clock, grab the Glock; why wait for night"
"Sweatin Bullets"; Brand Nubian, Everything Is Everything, 1994, Elektra Entertainment, Warner Communications, Time Warner, USA.


"A fight, a fight, a nigger and a white, if the nigger don’t win then we all jump in. . . . smoking all [of] America’s white boys"; "A Fight"; Apache, Apache Ain’t Shit, 1993, Tommy Boy Music, Time Warner, USA.

"I kill a devil right now. . . . I say kill whitey all nightey long. . . . I stabbed a fucking Jew with a steeple. . . . I would kill a cracker for nothing, just for the fuck of it. . . . Menace Clan kill a cracker; jack ‘em even quicker. . . . catch that devil slipping; blow his fucking brains out""Fuck a Record Deal"; Menace Clan, Da Hood, 1995, Rap-A-Lot Records, Noo Trybe Records, subsidiaries of Thorn EMI; called The EMI Group since 1997, United Kingdom.

"He prays on old white ladies [who] drive the Mercedes with the windows cracked. . . . you should’ve heard the bitch screaming. . . . sticking guns in crackers’ mouths. . . . the cops can’t stop it. . . . remember 4-29-92, come on; Florence and Normandy coming to a corner near you, cracker; we’ve been through your area, mass hysteria; led by your motherfucking Menace Clan""Mad Nigga"; Menace Clan, Da Hood, 1995, Rap-A-Lot Records, Noo Trybe Records, Time Warner, USA.

"The black man is god. . . . buy a Tec [and] let loose in the Vatican. . . . I love the black faces; so put your Bible in the attic""Ain’t No Mystery"; Brand Nubian, In God We Trust, 1992, Elektra Entertainment, Warner Communications, Time Warner, USA.


"Rhymes is rugged like burnt buildings in Harlem; the Ol Dirty Bastard. . . . I’m also militant. . . . snatching devils up by the hair, then cut his head off" "Cuttin Headz"; Ol Dirty Bastard, Return of the 36 Chambers: the Dirty Version; 1995, Elektra Entertainment, Time Warner, USA.


"Listen to this black visionary, bringing war like a revolutionary. . . . go on a killing spree, putting devils out their misery; hearing screams, sounds of agony; my hostility takes over me. . . . camouflaged ninjas avenging" "Under Seige"; Killarmy, Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars, 1997, Wu-Tang Records, Priority Records, The EMI Group, United Kingdom.


THIS IS JUST TO NAME A FEW. Hard to believe isn’t it? These are ALL black individuals who HATE white men. And you think Christians are Blood thirsty? You think that we’re bigots? You think that we’re the most racist and hateful? It only makes me sad. I hope you see my point. And just so you know, I included some rap artists from the United Kingdom. Just for your reference.


And as for you thinking that we’re money obsessed, I think that many people, Christian and otherwise are obsessed with money. That’s one of man’s many short comings. But that statement you made was just preposterous. You can’t say that Christians are the most money obsessed. Money obsession is something that every type of person of any religion is capable of. So your statement wasn’t justified nor was it accurate.
I also was disgusted with your rendition of the 10 commandments. "Thou shalt despise anyone who isn’t white, male, affluent and heterosexual" and "Thou shalt not kill Americans but life anywhere outside that country is cheap and disposable". Only a truly puerile mind could come up with that kind of thing. The bible doesn’t say those things. What you just spouted off was a sick bias. Get over yourself. And if you think that Americans find life outside of our country so "cheap" and "Disposable", then why is our country trillions of dollars in debt? I don’t see other countries with such a charitable demeanor. You are indeed mislead. Perhaps you should complain about big countries like Africa who starve their people to death.


"So the world faces another four years of Bush’s bullying.". What do you mean by bullying? Is your image of Bush so twisted that you can’t determine the difference between "bullying" and a steadfast continence? American’s are despised by so many countries, that if we were to have a leader that was incompetent or easily swayed, we would be in for it. And quite frankly, we couldn’t care less what the world thinks of our choices. This is our country, and if you don’t care for our president, then that’s too bad. Stay in England. The people here that don’t like Bush will just have to go on with their lives, and if they want change, then they can work for that change. Because it’s their right as Americans.


As you go on farther into your post, you make several comments about Bush and the war in Iraq. It’s obvious that you feel Bush is only using the war as a cover up so that we can get more oil. Wrong. The war is to stop terrorism. I’m sure that you’ve heard of the beheadings that have been taking place. Do you ignore that fact that those beheadings are done by terrorists? Do you know the definition of Terrorist or Terrorism? Do you need to be in front of a camera with a knife to your throat to understand? Do you need to see children blown to shreds by their own parents just to kill a few marines? Don’t you see that these people are twisted? They terrorize their whole country. The Iraqi people were living in hell, and yet you claim that America is there to get oil? So what was our incentive to go save your hides during WWII? Yes, WWII. It does have a pertinent point about this war. It’s the principle. The point is that we were provoked. We went into action ONLY after an attack on our home shores. In WWII, it was Pearl Harbor. And 9/11, it was the twin towers.

The items that follow are listed out in the order that they were written.

1. Bush’s unilateral decision making, arrogance, blatant misleading of the American people concerning the war in Iraq, Afganistan and Palestine.

His decision to go to war with Iraq was supported by Sen. Kerry. So if you’re still saying that he is a "unilateral" decision maker, then you need to read a book about democracy. Things must be run through a process. He makes a decision and gets it approved. Bush is a good example of a Christian so we don’t feel that he is arrogant. Maybe it’s just your insecure British sensibilities. And lastly, if you want to talk about misleading people, then you should look up John Kerry’s senatorial voting record.

2. The world is tired of the killing.

Good. That’s why we went to Iraq. To stop the murder and rape and terrorism. Now what’s your point?
3. The world is tired of the empire building.


Last I looked, America was a free country. We obviously don’t care to build an empire. But if you read some of your cultures history books, you’ll find that your ancestor’s were quite adept at empire building.

4. The world is tired of "Bush’s simplistic good/evil "you’re either for us, or against us" polarity".

Because we are the most powerful and the most wealthy country in the world, we have to know who our friends are. So yes, you are for us, or against us.

5. The world is tired of the way that Bush "blackmails smaller countries, gobbles up their trade, strips their resources and spits them out.

Where did you get that trash? From a cereal box???

6. The world is tired of the flouting of international laws, the concentration camps in Guantanamo Bay, the torture and illegal imprisonment of Muslims against whom, there is no evidence at all.

Concentration camps, eh? That’s a sick metaphor Fox. Your accusations cause me no more pause than those of an ill tempered brat. You sceam that their containment was unjust, yet you fail to look farther than the front page of the "London Times". If you plan on making such remarks, be prepared first.

And if you read your history books, you will find out what a concentration camp is. The Muslims that we brought to Guantanamo bay were suspected of war crimes, or ties with Saddam or Osama. They were fed 3 meals a day, bathed, and had a place to sleep. They were not tortured, they were grilled. In other words, we asked them a ton of questions. But now you’re wondering about the female marine that had one of the containees on a leash. She received a Court Marshel and was dealt with accordingly. And after these Muslims were let out of containment, they were able to sue us. And they have.

7. The world is tired of the fictions fed to them.

You can thank the media for that.

So, what have we learned by this? Hopefully that you should leave America to their own decisions rather than assuming that we’ve been duped by our leaders. You’ve been wrong so far, what’s one more? And I believe that had there ever been a real "international fraternity" the world wouldn’t have so many problems. And speaking of which, why don’t you focus some of that passion on your own country’s problems? Your crime rate is, statistically, astronomical since you banned guns. Snort* You guys don’t even need a leader to dupe you. You do a great job of botching things up yourselves. And I still can’t believe that Asians and Europeans find it incredible that 93% of American’s don’t hold passports.... maybe you should get out more often. (By the way, I didn’t know that 93% didn’t own passports! Kudos to you lad, What, what!)

And meanwhile, Fox dear, Osama is somewhere in a mountain cave shaking in his boots.

Congratulations to President Bush for winning the re-election!

-Katy